[Python-ideas] Cofunctions - an enhancement to yield-from
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Aug 1 15:20:37 CEST 2010
Is it an enhancement or really an alternate proposal?
From an outsider's view (mine :-)), I think this alternative makes more
sense than trying to stretch the generator protocol far beyond what it
was designed for at the start. It would also clearly separate the two
use cases of generative iteration and coroutines.
If so many people think coroutines are important, then it may be time
to give them first-class synctatical support in Python.
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:09:55 +1200
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> I've been thinking about this idea for a while, and now
> that I've got yield-from nailed down to my satisfaction,
> I thought I'd put it out there to see if anyone else
> thinks it would be a good thing.
> A drawback of 'yield from' as a coroutine mechanism is that it must
> be used every time a function forming part of a coroutine calls
> another function that can suspend the coroutine, either directly
> or indirectly.
> This makes the code read somewhat awkwardly and provides many
> opportunities for the programmer to make errors. It also introduces
> considerable coupling, since changing one's mind about whether a
> function needs to be suspendable requires revisiting all the call
> sites of that function.
> This proposal builds on the 'yield from' proposal by introducing a
> new kind of function that I will call a "cofunction".
> A cofunction is a special kind of generator, with the following
> - It is defined by using the keyword 'codef' in place of 'def'.
> - It is always a generator, even if it does not contain any yields.
> - Whenever a call is made inside a cofunction, it is done using a
> special COCALL opcode. This first looks for a __cocall__ method
> on the object being called. If present, it is expected to
> return an iterable object, which is treated as though 'yield from'
> had been performed on it.
> If the object being called does not have a __cocall__ method,
> or it returns NotImplemented, the call is made in the usual way
> through the __call__ method.
> - Cofunctions themselves have a __cocall__ method that does the
> same thing as __call__.
> Using these cofunctions, it should be possible to write coroutine code
> that looks very similar to ordinary code. Cofunctions can call both
> ordinary functions and other cofunctions using ordinary call syntax.
> The only special consideration is that 'codef' must be used to define
> any function that directly or indirectly calls another cofunction.
> A few subtle details:
> - Ordinary generators will *not* implement __cocall__. This is so
> that a cofunction can e.g. contain a for-loop that iterates over
> a generator without erroneously triggering yield-from behaviour.
> - Some objects that wrap functions will need to be enhanced with
> __cocall__ methods that delegate to the underlying function.
> Obvious ones that spring to mind are bound methods, staticmethods
> and classmethods.
> Returning NotImplemented is specified as one of the possible
> responses of __cocall__ so that a wrapper can report that the
> wrapped object does not support __cocall__.
More information about the Python-ideas