[Python-ideas] Cofunctions PEP - Revision 4
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Aug 13 06:13:50 CEST 2010
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Greg Ewing
<greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Are you perhaps confusing the value produced by 'yield'
> with the function return value of a cofunction or a
> generator used with yield-from? They're different things,
> and it's the return value that gets seen by the function
> doing the cocall or yield-from. That's what enables you
> to think you're writing in a normal imperative style.
I'll admit that I was forgetting the difference between the return
value of yield and that of yield from. So send() isn't essential.
> def sock_readline(sock):
> buf = ""
> while buf[-1:] != "\n":
> data = sock.recv(1024)
> if not data:
> buf += data
> if not buf:
> return buf
> The 'yield' in there is what suspends the coroutine, and
> it neither sends or receives any value. The data read from
> the socket is returned to the caller by the return
> statement at the end. [Clarification: block_for_reading
> doesn't actually suspend, it just puts the current
> coroutine on a list to be woken up when the socket is
But the "yield" is also the point that allows the scheduler to throw
in an exception to indicate that the socket has gone away and that the
error should be propagated up the coroutine stack.
You need throw() at least to participate in proper exception handling.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-ideas