[Python-ideas] Using only patches for pulling changes in hg.python.org
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 6 12:56:00 CEST 2010
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:41:19 +1000
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Although, as with the CVS to SVN transmissions, the workflows of
>> committers will likely change over time as we become more adept at
>> exploiting the more powerful tool.
>> I liked Joel Spolsky's observation that in moving from a centralised
>> VCS to a distributed VCS, the key idea to wrap your head around is the
>> shift from managing file (and repository) revisions to coherent
> I suspect Spolsky has skipped on SVN then, because SVN already allows
> for coherent changesets (that's how we use it most of the time anyway).
No it doesn't. It has atomic commits (as do many other centralised
version control systems), but it still only manages file revisions.
The mental conversion Spolsky was talking about was specifically from
SVN to Hg, the same one we're looking at. A DVCS isn't written in
terms of file revisions the way SVN is, it's written in terms of a
directed acyclic graph of changesets.
If anyone wants to see what he actually wrote, rather than my hacked
up paraphrase of it, it's the last programming article he did for Joel
on Software: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2010/03/17.html
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-ideas