[Python-ideas] integer dividion in R -- PS
Xavier Ho
contact at xavierho.com
Fri May 7 11:50:10 CEST 2010
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote:
> No: PEP 238 is (partly) about how integer division is expressed in
> Python; not about its semantics. Python's choice for integer
> division with negative arguments goes back much further. From
> Misc/HISTORY:
>
> ==================================
> ==> RELEASE 0.9.6 (6 Apr 1992) <==
> ==================================
>
> [...]
>
> New features in 0.9.6:
>
> [...]
>
> - Division and modulo for long and plain integers with negative operands
> have changed; a/b is now floor(float(a)/float(b)) and a%b is defined
> as a-(a/b)*b. So now the outcome of divmod(a,b) is the same as
> (a/b, a%b) for integers. For floats, % is also changed, but of course
> / is unchanged, and divmod(x,y) does not yield (x/y, x%y)...
> [...]
>
Nice! Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> Personally, I've always liked Python's behaviour in this regard: for
> the few times that I've needed an 'x % y' operation that works with
> both positive and negative x, more often than not x-y*floor(x/y) turns
> out to be what I need. I've lost count of the number times I've had
> to write something awkward like:
>
> /* adjust for the exponent; first reduce it modulo _PyHASH_BITS */
> e = e >= 0 ? e % _PyHASH_BITS : _PyHASH_BITS-1-((-1-e) %
> _PyHASH_BITS);
>
> in C.
>
Wow. I would never write code like that, but you got a fair point.
Cheers,
Xav
(Mark: Sorry, I forgot to reply to the correct list.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20100507/25a3cfa0/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list