[Python-ideas] Making Python more enterprise technology
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed May 12 00:37:36 CEST 2010
Mark Summerfield wrote:
> One possible way would be to standardize one particular version, but not
> the next two minor releases. For example, standardize 3.2, but not 3.3
> or 3.4, then standardize 3.5, but not 3.6 or 3.7, and so on. This would
> mean that the standardization effort would take place about every four
> years (and which would only affect those involved in the standardization
> process). There would however, be a cost to the development community:
> maintaining the standardized version (e.g., bug & security fixes) until
> it is superceded.
Someone could always decide to standardise Python 2.7 ;)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list