[Python-ideas] Bring back callable()
Michael Foord
fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Wed Nov 24 00:14:29 CET 2010
On 23 November 2010 23:01, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Python 3 has removed callable() under the justification that's it's not
> very useful and duck typing (EAFP) should be used instead. However,
> it has since been felt by many people that it was an annoying loss;
> there are situations where you truly want to know whether something is a
> callable without actually calling it (for example when writing
> sophisticated decorators, or simply when you want to inform the user
> of an API misuse).
>
> The substitute of writing `isinstance(x, collections.Callable)` is
> not good, 1) because it's wordier 2) because collections is really not
> an intuitive place where to look for a Callable ABC.
>
> So, I would advocate bringing back the callable() builtin, which was
> easy to use, helpful and semantically sane.
>
+1 I find it useful in Python 2. You have to know its limitations, but it is
still useful.
Michael
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
>
--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20101123/4772ef96/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list