[Python-ideas] syntax for set

Masklinn masklinn at masklinn.net
Wed Nov 24 13:37:37 CET 2010

On 2010-11-24, at 11:57 , Carl M. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Mike Meyer <
> mwm-keyword-python.b4bdba at mired.org> wrote:
>> "Masklinn" <masklinn at masklinn.net> wrote:
>>> As an alternative, I would modestly propose banning integer literals
>>> altogether in favor of english-spelled constants: `ONE` can hardly be
>>> confused with the letter `l`, and having to write `FIVE HUNDRED
>>> ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY ONE` rather than 514451981921 would
>>> surely reduce the usage of redundant magic numbers in the code.
> +1 If it's good enough for my banker when writing checks, it should be good
> enough for Python. But it might be safer if we required the Arabic numerals
> in parentheses following the English. If the two don't match, we could raise
> a CheckingError. Seems to be a basically self-documenting error type to me.

But then we're back with the possible confusion between arabic numerals and ascii characters.

Still, I think this idea is a good one, we need some kind of checksum. Maybe it could be merged with Mike's proposal: the "basic english" number is followed by the same number written using roman numerals and the two versions are checked against one another to ensure consistency.

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list