[Python-ideas] Expanding statistical functions in Python's std. lib.

[Guido van Rossum]

You didn't get any responses AFAICT. That doesn't mean nobody is
interested -- perhaps your proposal is simply too general? Do you feel
up to making some more specific recommendations about the exact list
of functions to add? It's easier to criticize a concrete proposal. Do
you feel up to producing a patch that just adds the incomplete beta
function?

--Guido

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Spectral One <ghostwriter402 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wandering about, looking up statistics info for a program I was writing, I
> found a recommendation to add various useful 'special functions' to C's math
> library:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1069.pdf
>
> The arguments in that paper make a lot of sense to me, and apply well to
> Python. They came up with a good list, IMnsHO. I'd recommend implementing
> this list in some form as library functions in Python.
>
> Blindly copying wouldn't end up particularly 'Pythonic;' tweaking the API is
> required.    Some of the selection choices, such as returning real only,
> ought to be reevaluated, for example. Obviously, any of the decisions to
> keep things C-like rather than object-oriented ought to shift, as well.
>
> Function names are only important as far as they are clear. I suggest naming
> per <general category><specific case> e.g. distribution_t(), or dist_F(),
> and include modification for algebraic order, as well, so gamma() and
> log_gamma(). That said, anything clear is fine.
>
> Thoughts on the matter? I noticed that the math library in 2.7+ added the
> gamma and log(gamma) functions, already, which was nice. Obviously, most, if
> not all, are already present in extensions modules such as NumPy, but there
> is value in having these things built into the language. "Batteries
> included, "and all that.
>
>
>
> By the by, if that is far too much for one suggestion, then please just
> treat this as a suggestion to add just the incomplete beta function.
> (P-values for binomial, F, and t are all nice, too, though with inc. beta,
> they aren't terrible to generate. I really think they should be included in
> the standard library.)
>
> -Nate
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)