[Python-ideas] Python Users Aren't Perfect
ned at nedbatchelder.com
Fri Dec 16 03:56:27 CET 2011
On 12/15/2011 8:39 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu
> <mailto:tjreedy at udel.edu>> wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 3:42 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> This is another place where Python is inconsistent. We're
> told, "lists
> are for homogenous sequences of varying length, like a C
> array; tuples
> are for heterogenous aggregations of known length, like a C
> I have not been told that for several years, and I am pretty sure
> you will not find any such thing in the current docs. I consider
> it pretty much obsolete, as the differences that flowed from that
> idea are gone. In Python 3, tuples have all the non-mutating
> sequence methods that list does. The situation was much different
> in 1.4.
> I strongly disagree. Being immutable sequences (i.e. homogeneous) is a
> minor secondary role for tuples. Their primary role remains to hold a
> small bunch of heterogeneous values -- like namedtuple, but without
> needing forethought. A good example are dictionary items -- these are
> (key, value) pairs where for a given dict, the keys are all of the
> same type (or of a small set of related types) and ditto for the
> values, but the key type and the value types are unrelated.
Could you explain why the foo(*args) syntax creates args as a tuple
rather than a list?
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/%7Eguido>)
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas