[Python-ideas] PEP 3155 - Qualified name for classes and functions
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Nov 6 02:37:14 CET 2011
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you're all overthinking this. We want a notation that:
> 1. Makes it clear attribute access won't work
> 2. Indicates where the nested definition really lives
> 3. Gives a reasonable error message if you do try to evaluate it
>
> "f.<locals>.g" ticks all those boxes, so it's fine.
>
+1. Let's stop the bikeshedding.
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20111105/4245aed7/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list