[Python-ideas] Documenting Python warts on Stack Overflow

[Eli Bendersky]

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>wrote:

> I am thinking about [python-wart] on SO. There is no currently a list of
> Python warts, and building a better language is impossible without a clear
> visibility of warts in current implementations.
>
> Why Roundup doesn't work ATM.
> - warts are lost among other "won't fix" and "works for me" issues
> - no way to edit description to make it more clear
> - no voting/stars to percieve how important is this issue
> - no comment/noise filtering
> and the most valuable
> - there is no query to list warts sorted by popularity to explore other
> time-consuming areas of Python you are not aware of, but which can popup
> one day
>
> SO at least allows:
> + voting
> + community wiki edits
> + useful comment upvoting
> + sorted lists
> + user editable tags (adding new warts is easy)
>
> This post is a result of facing with numerous locals/settrace/exec issues
> that are closed on tracker. I also have my own list of other issues
> (logging/subprocess) at GC project, which I might be unable to maintain in
> future. There is also some undocumented stuff (subprocess deadlocks) that
> I'm investigating, but don't have time for a write-up. So I'd rather move
> this somewhere where it could be updated.
>  --
>

Is this a question or just a rant? If it's a question, I must have missed
what it is exactly that you're asking?

The web is a pretty free place. Feel free to create such a tag on Stack
Overflow and maintain it, if the SO community agrees it has merit. Don't
expect the Python developers to officially endorse it, because "warts" is a
very subjective issue. A "wart" for one person is a reasonable behavior for
another.

Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20121226/5f98d374/attachment.html>