[Python-ideas] working on a PEP for the __preview__ package

[Dj Gilcrease]

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Matt Joiner <anacrolix at gmail.com> wrote:
> The name is unoffensive, and somewhat more palatable than __preview__,
> which really isn't a protocol, or a bag for special interpreter
> switches like __future__.

It can be a bag for special interpreter switches or packages that are
up for api review. Also not using a dunder name space indicates
stability so it isnt an option