[Python-ideas] Syntax for defining parametric decorators

[Mike Graham]

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Beyond that, no, this is too limited - it only helps when there's no extra
> code in the outer scope which, in my experience, is the exception rather
> than the rule.

I'm not sure I think that's the case. functools.wraps,
functools.lru_cache, and reprlib.recursive_repr are the only stdlib
decorator factories I could think of, and all of them could use this
syntax. So could the ones I could quickly find in my own code.

Mike