[Python-ideas] The "in"-statement
Devin Jeanpierre
jeanpierreda at gmail.com
Tue Nov 6 08:55:17 CET 2012
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Mike Graham <mikegraham at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 05.11.12 21:28, Markus Unterwaditzer wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought it would be neat if i could do::
>>>
>>> in obj:
>>> first_attr = "value"
>>> second_attr = "value2"
>>
>>
>> vars(obj).update(
>> first_attr="value",
>> second_attr="value2",
>> )
>>
>> Or obj.__dict__.update.
>
> Tinkering with the object's attribute dict directly using either of
> these is extremely error-prone because it does not work for many
> objects and because it circumvents the descriptor protocol.
def update_vars(obj, **kwargs):
for k, v in kwargs.iteritems():
setattr(obj, k, v)
update_vars(obj,
a=b,
c=d)
-- Devin
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list