[Python-ideas] PEP 428 - object-oriented filesystem paths

Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Fri Oct 12 22:33:14 CEST 2012


Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:23:46 -0700
> Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
>> Which is why I would like to see Path based on str, despite Guido's 
>> misgivings.  (Yes, I know I'm probably tilting at windmills here...)
>>
>> If Path is string based we get backwards compatibility with all the os 
>> and third-party tools that expect and use strings; this would allow a 
>> gentle migration to using them, as opposed to the all-or-nothing if Path 
>> is a completely new type.
> 
> It is not all-or-nothing since you can just call str() and it will work
> fine with both strings and paths.

D'oh.  You're correct, of course.

What I was thinking was along the lines of:

--> some_table = Path('~/addresses.dbf')
--> some_table = os.path.expanduser(some_table)

vs


--> some_table = Path('~/addresses.dbf')
--> some_table = Path(os.path.expanduser(str(some_table)))

The Path/str sandwich is ackward, as well as verbose.

~Ethan~



More information about the Python-ideas mailing list