[Python-ideas] Personal views/filters (summaries) for discussions
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Apr 28 20:42:17 CEST 2013
Ned Batchelder writes:
> I don't see a way around that. If someone understood the entire
> discussion well enough to apply filters, etc, then we'd already
> have reached an agreement.
+1 Almost a tautology, but even so a crucial insight.
> I don't know how much appetite the Python-ideas list will have for
> further discussions of these ideas.
It's really off-topic. Python-ideas is for proposals to change Python
(the language) or cpython (or other implementations) that aren't
concrete enough or are too bike-sheddable to belong on python-dev. If
he were to write such a tool in Python and ask for advice, Oleg would
show up and tell him to ask on python-list. :-)
If he had a specific proposal to adopt an existing workflow tool that
could be just plugged in, that would be on-topic (for lack of an open-
subscription python-cabal list).[1]
Footnotes:
[1] open-cabal is an oxymoron, of course. And TINC. Of course. ;-)
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list