[Python-ideas] Anonymous blocks (again):

[Ned Batchelder]

On 5/12/2013 1:22 PM, Juancarlo Añez wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ncoghlan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > I've tried everything, so I'm pretty sure that there's no clean
>     solution in
>     > 2.7/3.3.
>
>     Correct. This is why PEP 403 exists.
>
>
> PEP 403 sucks!

There's no need for that tone.  Everyone here is being respectful, you 
can be also.

--Ned.

>
> It's a very ill attempt at replacing the need for anonymous blocks, 
> which could be done syntax very like the current one.
>
> ATIAIHTSAT!
>
> This thread is closed, AFAIC. I am in peace with the must-be-functions 
> of Python blocks. Smarter people than me will figure things out.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- 
> Juancarlo *Añez*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20130512/ba3f1685/attachment.html>