[Python-ideas] Possible new slice behaviour? Was ( Negative slice discussion.)

Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Nov 5 11:51:12 CET 2013

Previous message: [Python-ideas] Possible new slice behaviour? Was ( Negative slice discussion.)
Next message: [Python-ideas] Possible new slice behaviour? Was ( Negative slice discussion.)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ron Adam wrote:
>     >>> s[:100, trimi, reversei]

-1. This conflicts with the convention of indexing multi-dimensional
data structures using comma-separated expressions.

-- 
Greg

Previous message: [Python-ideas] Possible new slice behaviour? Was ( Negative slice discussion.)
Next message: [Python-ideas] Possible new slice behaviour? Was ( Negative slice discussion.)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list