[Python-ideas] Introduce collections.Reiterable
steve at pearwood.info
Sun Sep 22 04:56:43 CEST 2013
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:14:56PM -0400, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> If you really think that there will never be a non-reiterable non-iterator
> iterable, then the standard should promise that and we're in total
Which standard are you referring to? It would help if you specified a
concrete place in the documentation that you would like to see changed,
and a concrete suggestion for what change you would like to see.
You should start with a definition of what precisely you mean by a
Reiterable, and an example of what does, and what doesn't, count under
that defintion. Even if you've already done so, this thread has become
too big and too lumbering for me to keep track of everything discussed
in it, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
More information about the Python-ideas