[Python-ideas] Proto-PEP: Preserving the order of **kwargs in a function.
Eric Snow
ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sun Apr 6 18:34:39 CEST 2014
On Apr 6, 2014 4:39 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> There *is* a connection here: this needs to play nice with the ordered
> kwargs in order to handle the pass-through case correctly.
>
> The guarantee that the order of the supplied mapping (minus any
> entries that map to named parameters) will be preserved needs to be
> made explicit.
You're right. It's already implied by OrderedDict. However the point
*should* be explicit.
-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20140406/116b2b55/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list