[Python-ideas] sum(...) limitation
Antoine Pitrou
antoine at python.org
Wed Aug 13 20:03:17 CEST 2014
Le 13/08/2014 12:37, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
>
> sum() is *not* the One Obvious Way to add arbitrary objects in every
> domain.
Well, it is. It's a builtin and it's called "sum", which makes it pretty
clear it adds objects together. That could hardly be any more obvious,
actually: all competitors are *less* obvious.
Indeed it cannot *practically* be the most efficient or accurate to sum
arbitrary objects, unless we manage to devise a clever protocol
(__sum__? how would that work?) that can delegate to arbitrary
third-party code. But people are bound to think, legitimately, that
built-in sum() is the logical answer when wanting to sum a sequence of
objects.
(of course, whether or not "sum" is a reasonable notion when applied to
strings - rather than lists or floats - is a separate question)
Regards
Antoine.
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list