[Python-ideas] Add an introspection API to Executor
Ram Rachum
ram at rachum.com
Mon Aug 25 19:37:25 CEST 2014
"some other pieces of runtime state cannot be reliably computed"
Can you please specify which ones you mean, and why not reliable?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote:
> Le 25/08/2014 09:44, Dan O'Reilly a écrit :
>
>
>> So, at the very least there have been plans to internally keep track
>> active/idle thread counts. If others agree it's a good idea, I'll open
>> an issue on the tracker for this and include my patch (which also
>> addresses that TODO item).
>>
>
> I agree that basic executor parameters could be reflected, and I also
> agree that some other pieces of runtime state cannot be reliably computed
> and therefore shouldn't be exposed.
>
> Don't hesitate to open an issue with your patch.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
> --
>
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "python-ideas" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> topic/python-ideas/pl3r5SsbLLU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> python-ideas+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20140825/62376a75/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list