[Python-ideas] Infix matrix-multiply, but not general infix operators?
Jared Grubb
jared.grubb at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 08:41:40 CET 2014
A couple months back, Andrew Barnet brought up the idea of adding a way to apply functions in an infix style. It really didnt gain much traction. (Subject line "Infix Functions")
Nathaniel Smith has just proposed a PEP to add an infix matrix multiply operator, and everyone seems to love it.
I honestly am surprised at the difference in reaction. Why are we so quick to add a single-purpose punctuation mark, but reject a named infix operator that works for many general cases? Is the matrix-multiply use case so special?
I dont oppose the PEP, and I dont mean to derail it. And I know there was quite a bit of discussion on Andrew's email. But I cant help feel that Andrew's idea didnt get the appreciation it should. (But hey, I'm biased because I like the idea :))
Jared
QUICK SUMMARY OF ANDREW'S EMAIL:
(Not a proposal for syntax or naming)
m `cross` n
m `dot` n
a `Pair` b
a `Tree` (b `Tree` c `Tree` d) `Tree` e
And of course the matrix multiply (and matrix div that was briefly discussed) are implementable too:
m `mmul` n
m `mdiv` n
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list