[Python-ideas] Fwd: [RFC] draft PEP: Dedicated infix operators for matrix multiplication and matrix power
Robert Kern
robert.kern at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 20:14:09 CET 2014
On 2014-03-26 18:59, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 14/03/14 18:53, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> - Did you consider a duck-typing (is that the word?) attribute?
>> E.g. a*b is elementwise multiplication; a.M*b must be used for
>> matrix multiplication.
>
> This is exactly what has been tried with the types numpy.matrix and numpy.array.
For the record, no it hasn't. The proposal here is different than the
numpy.matrix status quo. The proposed result of `a.M*b` would be an ndarray, not
whatever the .M type is. The .M type would not be intended to be used outside of
a multiplication expression. It is unlikely to propagate through ones code the
way that numpy.matrix does (at least, it would be considered a bug to let a free
.M type loose). One could safely write their functions expecting only
numpy.ndarrays.
While this proposal has been considered and rejected, it is not the same as
numpy.matrix and has been rejected for different reasons.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list