[Python-ideas] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

[random832 at fastmail.us]

For some reason it tried to send my message to a @googlegroups.com
address, likely because this for some reason shows up in the other
user's headers instead of the correct email address.

On Mon, May 19, 2014, at 14:48, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
> Hello random832 at fastmail.us,
> 
> We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact
> (python-ideas) may not exist, or you may not have permission to post
> messages to the group. A few more details on why you weren't able to
> post:
> 
>  * You might have spelled or formatted the group name incorrectly.
>  * The owner of the group may have removed this group.
>  * You may need to join the group before receiving permission to post.
>  * This group may not be open to posting.
> 
> If you have questions related to this or any other Google Group, visit
> the Help Center at http://groups.google.com/support/.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Google Groups
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original message -----
> 
> X-Received: by 10.50.32.4 with SMTP id e4mr126025igi.7.1400525310266;
>         Mon, 19 May 2014 11:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-Path: <random832 at fastmail.us>
> Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
> (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.27])
>         by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
>         bu7si4056012pad.0.2014.05.19.11.48.29
>         for <python-ideas at googlegroups.com>
>         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>         bits=128/128);
>         Mon, 19 May 2014 11:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of random832 at fastmail.us
> designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.27;
> Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
>        spf=pass (google.com: domain of random832 at fastmail.us designates
>        66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=random832 at fastmail.us;
>        dkim=pass header.i=@fastmail.us
> Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa
> [10.202.2.46])
> 	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DB720ABA;
> 	Mon, 19 May 2014 14:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
>   by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 May 2014 14:48:28 -0400
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.us; h=
> 	message-id:from:to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
> 	:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:references; s=mesmtp; bh=
> 	U6FWb0C2uyTm8cceYVd+D9FI+LU=; b=A73KEJ7yw88fKnQPrc+QgfItUQV+aRd7
> 	w3+v0bLtjD+hul2EliX/jxu+oWr0r60DYKKYpKq6LaeqK3wZKiohTBraOw4yh+5+
> 	/AIlvOm4u1otMWb4TX2RLeRKjvaPkBZbr9aaRy9pJ9uYR2pugWxCCaV82nRhZoPS
> 	6bXzp7y7zPM=
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
> 	messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version
> 	:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to
> 	:references; s=smtpout; bh=U6FWb0C2uyTm8cceYVd+D9FI+LU=; b=fXFmo
> 	JvkBD6AI/AoBMbVe1LKbTgCoFtw2ERCmhTLa3/V7NqaltxUvvB3Rj51xJ+2RpQBR
> 	RBIeqyDDRYLjtwpy6CxK7ZpnbSQlHImhhQUCKSVSUFI5n97n9X5MVKdfIdfXu3Pn
> 	1udejeeAK095H3R9knwOCvdTHuFiI63/pA2Fm8=
> Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99)
> 	id 9CF84114773; Mon, 19 May 2014 14:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
> Message-Id:
> <1400525308.6670.119156649.17F929FF at webmail.messagingengine.com>
> X-Sasl-Enc: Y0SV34WN7zg7S+fK/epnscp+bHNT34v9NGD0AvnSqJX5 1400525308
> From: random832 at fastmail.us
> To: Ram Rachum <ram.rachum at gmail.com>, python-ideas at googlegroups.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Type: text/plain
> X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-988d4021
> Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] Expose `itertools.count.start` and implement
>  `itertools.count.__eq__` based on it, like `range`.
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:48:28 -0400
> In-Reply-To: <082cd87a-aeb5-49bf-9f79-d99a6d18e402 at googlegroups.com>
> References: <082cd87a-aeb5-49bf-9f79-d99a6d18e402 at googlegroups.com>
> 
> On Thu, May 15, 2014, at 16:02, Ram Rachum wrote:
> > I suggest exposing `itertools.count.start` and implementing 
> > `itertools.count.__eq__` based on it. This'll provide the same benefits 
> > that `range` got by exposing `range.start` and allowing `range.__eq__`.
> 
> I think this _and_ your other request reveal a misunderstanding of what
> itertools are. They're not "magic sequences", they're generators - the
> fact that you can use either a sequence or a generator in a for loop may
> have confused you. In other words, they're more like Python 2
> dict.iteritems than Python 2 xrange. It might be more reasonable to
> propose that a new module be created for "magic sequence" objects.


-- 
Random832