[Python-ideas] Top 10 Python modules that need a redesign Was: Geo coordinates conversion in stdlib
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sun Apr 5 15:13:44 CEST 2015
On 2015-04-05 01:45, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com
> <mailto:python at mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote:
>
> I am genuinely interested in the ways to improve date/time
> formatting in
> Python. There are certainly better ways than stftime. For
> example, ICU
> has a date/time format syntax that is much more readable:
> instead of
> "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", ICU format is "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss".
>
> I don't think it is hard to find a way to introduce ICU format in
> datetime.__format__ while preserving backward compatibility. For
> example, we may require that % is always "escaped" as '%' in
> ICU format
> and the presence of unescaped % can trigger strftime
> interpretation.
>
>
> [1] http://userguide.icu-project.org/formatparse/datetime
>
> Personally, I prefer some kind of escaping, possibly in the style of
> .format, e.g. "{year}-{month}-{day} {hour}:{minute}:{second}". (It'll
> probably need a little tinkering to shorten it! :-))
>
>
> Can someone explain to me why something like this or Anatoly's
> double-curly-brace variant is an improvement over
>
> >>> from datetime import *
> >>> "{0.year}-{0.month}-{0.day}
> {0.hour}:{0.minute}:{0.second}".format(datetime.now())
> '2015-4-4 20:43:23'
>
Maybe it just needs the addition of attributes for '%A' and '%a' (name
of day) and '%B' and '%b' (name of month).
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list