[Python-ideas] What's going on with PEP 448 - Additional Unpacking Generalizations ?

[Neil Girdhar]

Is there any way that I can help?

On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 1:05:45 PM UTC-5, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> I see no big problem with it from a language design perspective, but also 
> no reason to commit huge resources to it -- it's all very much in the "nice 
> to have" category. Unless you find a champion who wants to review the (old) 
> patch and so on, what's the point of accepting the PEP?
> On Jan 15, 2015 3:28 AM, "Chris Angelico" <ros... at gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Neil Girdhar <miste... at gmail.com 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>> > It says "standards track", but it doesn't seem to work in Python 3.4.  
>> I am
>> > really looking forward to this!  Any chance we can get a from 
>> __future__ for
>> > inclusion in 3.4?  Or maybe it can make it into 3.5?
>>
>> It also says "Status: Draft", which means it hasn't (yet) been
>> accepted as part of the language. That means it's definitely not going
>> to get into 3.4; it might be able to get into 3.5 if it gets approved
>> very shortly, but the time frame is narrowing. Last chance to get it
>> into 3.5 would be Beta 1, scheduled for May 24th (see PEP 478), and
>> ideally it should get into an alpha before that.
>>
>> Would be nice to actually have it land somewhere. Seems it's been
>> proposed for every Python version since 3.0.
>>
>> ChrisA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list
>> Python... at python.org <javascript:>
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150119/55ad05c6/attachment.html>