[Python-ideas] What's going on with PEP 448 - Additional Unpacking Generalizations ?
mistersheik at gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 18:16:16 CET 2015
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Joshua Landau <joshua at landau.ws> wrote:
> On 20 January 2015 at 16:51, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Okay, so: positional arguments neither follow keyword arguments nor
> > argument unpackings; iterable argument unpackings never follow keyword
> > argument unpackings.
> Yep. :)
> Incidentally, this confusion was why I originally suggested the more
> relaxed rules. It's probably not a problem for the end-user though,
> because nobody does it. It would probably be fine from an
> implementation perspective, too, now that I know how ast_for_call
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "python-ideas" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> python-ideas+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas