[Python-ideas] What's going on with PEP 448 - Additional Unpacking Generalizations ?

[Neil Girdhar]

Exactly…

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Joshua Landau <joshua at landau.ws> wrote:

> On 20 January 2015 at 16:51, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, so: positional arguments neither follow keyword arguments nor
> keyword
> > argument unpackings; iterable argument unpackings never follow keyword
> > argument unpackings.
>
> Yep. :)
>
> Incidentally, this confusion was why I originally suggested the more
> relaxed rules. It's probably not a problem for the end-user though,
> because nobody does it. It would probably be fine from an
> implementation perspective, too, now that I know how ast_for_call
> works.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "python-ideas" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/python-ideas/J99EFY1D1nI/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> python-ideas+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150120/c773bfeb/attachment.html>