[Python-ideas] Floating point "closeness" Proposal Outline
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Wed Jan 21 00:27:03 CET 2015
On 01/20/2015 09:32 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
>
>> If you decide to make a PEP, please list the other algorithms you found and their definitions.
>
> sure -- care to contribute ;-)
>> Personally, I'm for being consistent with numpy and defining math.isclose similar to numpy.isclose for consistency
>> alone.
>
> This is a good question for the larger, non-numpy group. I'm personally a heavy numpy user, and don't see any reason to
> be consistent -- and I (and others on this list) have some real issues with the numpy approach. But we shouldn't call it
> isclose() if it's not the same algorithm...
I'm not a numpy nor heavy maths user, and see no reason why we should try to match numpy -- if you want/need numpy, get
numpy.
There is also no reason to not use the same name, even if it is not the same algorithm -- if the answer we're looking
for is "is it close?" then is_close is a fine name (or isclose, similar to the other is... functions and methods Python
already has).
I think for simplicity' sake, a symmetric function would be better.
--
~Ethan~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20150120/307c2df6/attachment.sig>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list