[Python-ideas] Simpler syntax for basic iterations

[Mark Lawrence]

On 13/10/2015 21:35, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 13.10.2015 22:21, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 13/10/2015 18:59, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
>>> I still like instead of the cryptic __ or _
>>>
>>> for each in range(3):
>>>      dosomething
>>>
>>> To me, that reads like a normal English statement.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Sven
>>
>> No thanks.  The current situation has suited the Python community for
>> 25 years give or take, so if it ain't broke, there's no way it's going
>> to get fixed, thank goodness.  Can we move on please?
>>
>
> What exactly do you mean?
>

Stop pointlessly discussing something that simply is not going to happen.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence