[Python-ideas] Python's Source of Randomness and the random.py module Redux
random832 at fastmail.us
random832 at fastmail.us
Fri Sep 11 16:23:52 CEST 2015
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, at 09:36, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Yes, calling `random.choice` is *significantly better* than calling
> `random.SomethingRandom().choice`. It's better for beginners, it's even
> better for expert users whose random needs are small, and those whose
> needs are greater shouldn't be using the later anyway.
Why is it that people who need deterministic/seed based random aren't
considered to be "those whose needs are greater"?
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list