[Python-ideas] Pre-PEP Adding A Secrets Module To The Standard Library
Tim Peters
tim.peters at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 01:40:32 CEST 2015
[Guido]
> Thanks! I'd accept this (and I'd reject 504 at the same time). I like the
> secrets name. I wonder though, should the PEP propose a specific set of
> functions? (With the understanding that we might add more later.)
The bikeshedding on that will be far more tedious than the
implementation. I'll get it started :-)
No attempt to be minimal here. More-than-less "obvious" is more important:
Bound methods of a SystemRandom instance
.randrange()
.randint()
.randbits()
renamed from .getrandbits()
.randbelow(exclusive_upper_bound)
renamed from private ._randbelow()
.choice()
Token functions
.token_bytes(nbytes)
another name for os.urandom()
.token_hex(nbytes)
same, but return string of ASCII hex digits
.token_url(nbytes)
same, but return URL-safe base64-encoded ASCII
.token_alpha(alphabet, nchars)
string of `nchars` characters drawn uniformly
from `alphabet`
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list