[Python-ideas] Quick idea: defining variables from functions that take the variable name
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Wed Jun 1 11:10:47 EDT 2016
On 01.06.2016 16:06, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm not sure I follow this proposal. Could you explain a little please?
> x = Symbol('x')
> as the current approach, how would you modify that to work with your
> proposal? If you could show how you'd write a wrapper function
> AutoSymbol, so that
> x = AutoSymbol()
> did the same as the above, that'd help me a lot.
Okay, let's see.
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name # that's me :)
That's the current way. If now, the compiler would assign "x" to a
special dunder attribute/variable, that would allow __init__ to extract
that name and use it as if it were a parameter:
self.name = __assigned_name__ # that's me :)
That's just it. I consider __assigned_name__ the same as __module__. A
special variable available if you need it.
A two-step approach like the following would also be possible:
pass # no name available :(
def __name__(self, name):
self.name = name # that's me
In this case, name is not available in the constructor which could be
regarded as a drawback. A advantage would be possible optimization. No
__name__ member, no implicit call of __name__
On the caller site, nothing changes. It's just:
x = AutoSymbol()
Autosymbol either has __assigned_name__ set during constructor execution
or __name__() will be set later. The same logic could be applied to
other callables, functions, lambdas, etc.
This post does not really care about the name of the special
variable/member. It could also be '__lhs__'. I think others will come up
with better names. In the end, one name needs to be chosen of course. ;-)
More information about the Python-ideas