On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Rob Cliffe <rob.cliffe at btinternet.com> wrote: [...] > > [foo(x) for x in things if is not None] # What you wrote is already valid > syntax, equivalent to [foo(x) for x in things] Oh, of course! Thanks. I suppose my confusion may be an argument against the syntax ;) -- Koos