[Python-ideas] Working with Path objects: p-strings?
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Tue Mar 29 05:10:17 EDT 2016
On 27.03.2016 19:50, Brett Cannon wrote:
> The trick is whether that import statement will work when you call it.
> Import is currently the only bit of syntax that relies on Python code
> in CPython to work and making that happen took a lot of work. If you
> add in this concept of p-strings then suddenly we have two pieces of
> syntax that require Python code to work and on top of it p-strings
> would depend on import but also that we would then have to make sure
> to not have import depend on p-strings. And on top of it we would have
> to freeze pathlib and all of its dependencies which may or may not be
> preferable.
>
> My point is that it's not straight-forward and this proposal will have
> to consider some technical difficulties involved with it if it happens
> to go forward.
What solution can you propose to solve this?
Can this procedure be generalized and smoothed in order to reduce that
"lot of work" and to some extend enable a simpler language evolution?
Or would it be better to leave the bootstrapping infrastructure alone?
Best,
Sven
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list