[Python-ideas] Object grabbing
Franklin? Lee
leewangzhong+python at gmail.com
Sun May 1 23:28:44 EDT 2016
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Robert van Geel <robert at bign.nl> wrote:
> First of all I'm new to this. I tried figuring out if some inquiry like mine
> below already was posted but I couldn't find it, frankly partly because I
> don't know what to look for, I'm not sure if there's a name for this idea.
> I'm not convinced my idea below is solid so apologies if it's naïve but I
> figured to post it anyway.
> It has to do with the possibility to fold typical opcodes pairs by
> introducing a language construct.
>
> The idea is to be able to write this code:
>
> myobject.a
> myobject.b
> myobject.c()
> myobject.d = 1
>
> like this:
>
> using myobject:
> .a
> .b
> .c()
> .d = 1
Would the following solve your usecase? Explicit naming:
with myobject import a,b,c,d:
a
b
c()
d = 1
Alternatively, putting the object at the end (like in gen expressions):
with a,b,c,d from myobject:
a
b
c()
d = 1
Questions:
* Should this add additional scope?
* Descriptors and `__getattr__`-only attributes: Do you get the
attribute at the start of the block, or do you call `__getattr__`
every time?
* That `d = 1` is Pythonically odd if it works as in the original example.
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list