[Python-ideas] namedtuple literals [Was: RE a new namedtuple]

[Michel Desmoulin]

Having to define objects for scripts or small projects is really adding
a burden. A namedtuple litteral strike the perferfect balance between
expressivity and concision for those cases.

Le 21/07/2017 à 17:18, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Honestly I would like to declare the bare (x=1, y=0) proposal dead.
> Let's encourage the use of objects rather than tuples (named or
> otherwise) for most data exchanges. I know of a large codebase that uses
> dicts instead of objects, and it's a mess. I expect the bare ntuple to
> encourage the same chaos.
> 
> -- 
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>