[Python-ideas] namedtuple literals [Was: RE a new namedtuple]
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed Jul 26 11:48:52 EDT 2017
On 26 July 2017 at 03:49, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> I don't see how they could be compatible with tuples because the positions
> aren't fixed. You would need a NamedTuple where the type specifies the
Python 3.6+ guarantees that keyword-argument order is preserved in the
namespace passed to the called function.
This means that a function that only accepts **kwargs can reliably
check the order of arguments used in the call, and hence tell the
So because these are implicitly typed, you *can't* put the arguments
in an arbitrary order - you have to put them in the desired field
order, or you're going to accidentally define a different type.
If that possibility bothers someone and they want to avoid it, then
the solution is straightforward: predefine an explicit type, and use
that instead of an implicitly defined one.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-ideas