[Python-ideas] get() method for list and tuples
Sven R. Kunze
srkunze at mail.de
Fri Mar 3 13:48:15 EST 2017
On 03.03.2017 18:06, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 12:36 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
>> On 01.03.2017 06:34, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>>> On the bright side, if enough use-cases of this type come up (pesky
>>> try/except for a simple situation), we may be able
>>> to get Guido to reconsider PEP 463. I certainly think PEP 463 makes
>>> a lot more sense that adding list.get().
>>
>> It then would make sense to remove .get() on dicts. ;-)
>>
>> and to remove parameter "default" of max().
>> and to remove parameter "default" of getattr().
>
> Backwards compatibility, and performance, says no. ;)
>
> try/except expressions are not a silver bullet any more than
> try/except blocks. But they can still be very useful.
Totally true. I think both proposals have their merit.
IIRC, Guido rightfully declared that try/except expressions aren't a
good idea. It's better to find more concrete patterns instead of it. And
I still agree with him.
The "default parameter" pattern is such a pattern, and it's vastly used
in the stdlib.
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20170303/f3b5f8c5/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list