stephanh42 at gmail.com
Wed May 17 14:08:24 EDT 2017
"I hope the second ': int' can be omitted because 0 already is an int."
0 is also an Any, an object, a SupportAbs, and a Union[int, str].
And infinitely more, of course.
A typechecker needs to be explicitly told which was intended.
Op 17 mei 2017 19:52 schreef "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze at mail.de>:
On 17.05.2017 18:48, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
from typing import NamedTuple
"""Foo is a very important class and
you should totally use it.
baz: int = 0
return self.bar + self.baz
typing.NamedTuple supports docstrings, user-defined methods, and default
I hope the second ': int' can be omitted because 0 already is an int.
This makes me wonder three things:
1) Michel, can newcomers differentiate between when to use ' : ' and when
to use ' = ' and a combination thereof?
2) There must be a lot of cornercases where people rewrite Foo to be a
normal class in the end, right?
3) If one doesn't need tuple-__dunder__ methods, a "normal" class would
even need 1 line less. (+ Stephan's second point)
So, this still leaves those missing __dunder__ magic methods doing the
right thing at the right time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas