[Python-ideas] PEP 561: Distributing Type Information V3

Fri Oct 6 16:00:40 EDT 2017

Hello,

I have made some changes to my PEP on distributing type information. A
summary of the changes:

   - Move to adding a new metadata specifier so that more packaging tools
   can participate
   - Clarify version matching between third party stubs and runtime
   packages.
   - various other fixes for clarity, readability, and removal of repetition

As usual I have replicated a copy below.

Cheers,
Ethan

PEP: 561
Title: Distributing and Packaging Type Information
Author: Ethan Smith <ethan at ethanhs.me>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 09-Sep-2017
Python-Version: 3.7
Post-History:

Abstract
========

PEP 484 introduced type hinting to Python, with goals of making typing
gradual and easy to adopt. Currently, typing information must be distributed
manually. This PEP provides a standardized means to package and distribute
type information and an ordering for type checkers to resolve modules and
collect this information for type checking using existing packaging
architecture.

Rationale
=========

Currently, package authors wish to distribute code that has
inline type information. However, there is no standard method to distribute
packages with inline type annotations or syntax that can simultaneously
be used at runtime and in type checking. Additionally, if one wished to
ship typing information privately the only method would be via setting
``MYPYPATH`` or the equivalent to manually point to stubs. If the package
can be released publicly, it can be added to typeshed [1]_. However, this
does not scale and becomes a burden on the maintainers of typeshed.
Additionally, it ties bugfixes to releases of the tool using typeshed.

PEP 484 has a brief section on distributing typing information. In this
section [2]_ the PEP recommends using ``shared/typehints/pythonX.Y/`` for
shipping stub files. However, manually adding a path to stub files for each
third party library does not scale. The simplest approach people have taken
is to add ``site-packages`` to their ``MYPYPATH``, but this causes type
checkers to fail on packages that are highly dynamic (e.g. sqlalchemy
and Django).

Specification
=============

There are several motivations and methods of supporting typing in a package.
This PEP recognizes three (3) types of packages that may be created:

1. The package maintainer would like to add type information inline.

2. The package maintainer would like to add type information via stubs.

3. A third party would like to share stub files for a package, but the
   maintainer does not want to include them in the source of the package.

This PEP aims to support these scenarios and make them simple to add to
packaging and deployment.

The two major parts of this specification are the packaging specifications
and the resolution order for resolving module type information. The packaging
spec is based on and extends PEP 345 metadata. The type checking spec is
meant to replace the ``shared/typehints/pythonX.Y/`` spec of PEP 484 [2]_.

New third party stub libraries are encouraged to distribute stubs via the
third party packaging proposed in this PEP in place of being added to
typeshed. Typeshed will remain in use, but if maintainers are found, third
party stubs in typeshed are encouraged to be split into their own package.

Packaging Type Information
--------------------------
In order to make packaging and distributing type information as simple and
easy as possible, the distribution of type information, and typed Python code
is done through existing packaging frameworks. This PEP adds a new item to the
``*.distinfo/METADATA`` file to contain metadata about a package's support for
typing. The new item is optional, but must have a name of ``Typed`` and have a
value of either ``inline`` or ``stubs``, if present.

Metadata Examples::

    Typed: inline
    Typed: stubs

Stub Only Packages
''''''''''''''''''

For package maintainers wishing to ship stub files containing all of their
type information, it is prefered that the ``*.pyi`` stubs are alongside the
corresponding ``*.py`` files. However, the stubs may be put in a sub-folder
of the Python sources, with the same name the ``*.py`` files are in. For
example, the ``flyingcircus`` package would have its stubs in the folder
``flyingcircus/flyingcircus/``. This path is chosen so that if stubs are
not found in ``flyingcircus/`` the type checker may treat the subdirectory as
a normal package. The normal resolution order of checking ``*.pyi`` before
``*.py`` will be maintained.

Third Party Stub Packages
'''''''''''''''''''''''''

Third parties seeking to distribute stub files are encouraged to contact the
maintainer of the package about distribution alongside the package. If the
maintainer does not wish to maintain or package stub files or type information
inline, then a "third party stub package" should be created. The structure is
similar, but slightly different from that of stub only packages. If the stubs
are for the library ``flyingcircus`` then the package should be named
``flyingcircus-stubs`` and the stub files should be put in a sub-directory
named ``flyingcircus``. This allows the stubs to be checked as if they were in
a regular package.

In addition, the third party stub package should indicate which version(s)
of the runtime package are supported by indicating the runtime package's
version(s) through the normal dependency data. For example, if there was a
stub package ``flyingcircus-stubs``, it can indicate the versions of the
runtime ``flyingcircus`` package supported through ``install_requires``
in distutils based tools, or the equivalent in other packaging tools.

Type Checker Module Resolution Order
------------------------------------

The following is the order that type checkers supporting this PEP should
resolve modules containing type information:

1. User code - the files the type checker is running on.

2. Stubs or Python source manually put in the beginning of the path. Type
   checkers should provide this to allow the user complete control of which
   stubs to use, and patch broken stubs/inline types from packages.

3. Third party stub packages - these packages can supersede the installed
   untyped packages. They can be found at ``pkg-stubs`` for package ``pkg``,
   however it is encouraged to check the package's metadata using packaging
   query APIs such as ``pkg_resources`` to assure that the package is meant
   for type checking, and is compatible with the installed version.

4. Inline packages - finally, if there is nothing overriding the installed
   package, and it opts into type checking.

5. Typeshed (if used) - Provides the stdlib types and several third party
   libraries

Type checkers that check a different Python version than the version they run
on must find the type information in the ``site-packages``/``dist-packages``
of that Python version. This can be queried e.g.
``pythonX.Y -c 'import site; print(site.getsitepackages())'``. It is
also recommended
that the type checker allow for the user to point to a particular Python
binary, in case it is not in the path.

To check if a package has opted into type checking, type checkers are
recommended to use the ``pkg_resources`` module to query the package
metadata. If the ``typed`` package metadata has ``None`` as its value, the
package has not opted into type checking, and the type checker should skip
that package.

References
==========
.. [1] Typeshed (https://github.com/python/typeshed)

.. [2] PEP 484, Storing and Distributing Stub Files
   (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#storing-and-distributing-stub-files)

Copyright
=========

This document has been placed in the public domain.

..
   Local Variables:
   mode: indented-text
   indent-tabs-mode: nil
   sentence-end-double-space: t
   fill-column: 70
   coding: utf-8
   End:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20171006/67b7dfc4/attachment.html>