[Python-ideas] Why not picoseconds?
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sun Oct 15 14:15:53 EDT 2017
On 2017-10-15 19:02, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net
> <mailto:solipsis at pitrou.net>>wrote:
>
>
> Since new APIs are expensive and we'd like to be future-proof, why not
> move to picoseconds? That would be safe until clocks reach the THz
> barrier, which is quite far away from us.
>
>
> I somewhat like the thought, but would everyone then end up thinking
> about what power of 1000 they need to multiply with?
>
A simple solution to that would be to provide the multiplier as a named
constant.
[snip]
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list