[Python-ideas] Proposal: A Reduce-Map Comprehension and a "last" builtin
Rhodri James
rhodri at kynesim.co.uk
Thu Apr 5 13:08:25 EDT 2018
On 05/04/18 17:52, Peter O'Connor wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In Python, I often find myself building lists where each element depends on
> the last. This generally means making a for-loop, create an initial list,
> and appending to it in the loop, or creating a generator-function. Both of
> these feel more verbose than necessary.
>
> I was thinking it would be nice to be able to encapsulate this common type
> of operation into a more compact comprehension.
>
> I propose a new "Reduce-Map" comprehension that allows us to write:
>
> signal = [math.sin(i*0.01) + random.normalvariate(0, 0.1) for i in range(1000)]
> smooth_signal = [average = (1-decay)*average + decay*x for x in signal
> from average=0.]
Ew. This looks magic (and indeed is magic) and uses single equals
inside the expression (inviting "=" vs "==" gumbies). I think you are
trying to do too much in one go, and something like this is complex
enough that it shouldn't be in a comprehension in the first place.
> Instead of:
>
> def exponential_moving_average(signal: Iterable[float], decay: float,
> initial_value: float=0.):
> average = initial_value
> for xt in signal:
> average = (1-decay)*average + decay*xt
> yield average
>
> signal = [math.sin(i*0.01) + random.normalvariate(0, 0.1) for i in range(1000)]
> smooth_signal = list(exponential_moving_average(signal, decay=0.05))
Aside from unnecessarily being a generator, this reads better to me!
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list