[Python-ideas] Proposal: A Reduce-Map Comprehension and a "last" builtin
Peter O'Connor
peter.ed.oconnor at gmail.com
Fri Apr 6 10:58:10 EDT 2018
Ah, ok, I suppose that could easily lead to typo-bugs. Ok, then I agree
that "a:=f()" returning a is better
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Eric Fahlgren <ericfahlgren at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Peter O'Connor <peter.ed.oconnor at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> 3) The idea that an assignment operation "a = f()" returns a value (a) is
>> already consistent with the "chained assignment" syntax of "b=a=f()" (which
>> can be thought of as "b=(a=f())"). I don't know why we feel the need for
>> new constructs like "(a:=f())" or "(f() as a)" when we could just think of
>> assignments as returning values (unless that breaks something that I'm not
>> aware of)
>>
>
> Consider
>
> >>> if x = 1:
> >>> print("What did I just do?")
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20180406/b2aaf926/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list