[Python-ideas] Revisiting dedicated overloadable boolean operators

[Benedikt Werner]

> The proposal is for new operators.  The operators would be "bNOT", 
> "bAND", "bOR", and "bXOR".  They would be completely independent of 
> the existing "not", "and", and "or" operators, operating purely on 
> boolean values.  It would be possible to overload these operators.
I see, I misunderstood you there.
Then I have to say that these names really don't feel very pythonic to 
me. I guess they are still the best names out of the ones I have seen so 
far but I still don't like them very much.

I guess having overloadable operators with proper precedences would be 
quite handy for fluent style APIs but I don't think it's worth 
justifying a new set of operators.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/attachments/20180804/b83cdeb1/attachment-0001.html>