[Python-ideas] Consider adding an iterable option to dataclass
steve at pearwood.info
Fri Aug 10 20:29:41 EDT 2018
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 04:01:59PM -0700, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> It would be nice if dataclasses
> had an option to make them a sequence.
Do you have a use-case or reason for this other than "it would be nice"?
Nice in what way? We already have namedtuple, and for backwards
compatibility if no other reason it won't be going away. What benefit do
we get from allowing dataclasses to do what namedtuple already does?
You already mentioned one disadvantage: namedtuple is much more memory
efficient. What corresponding benefit do you see?
Dataclass already supports explicit conversion to tuples and dicts. What
use-cases for sequence-ness don't they support?
Conceptually, I think of dataclasses as a record or a struct, not as a
sequence. (I'll admit that I think of namedtuples the same way, and
almost never make use of their tuple-ness.) I would find it strange for
dataclass to support a sequence API out of the box.
More information about the Python-ideas