[Python-ideas] Suggest adding struct iter_unpack allowing mixed formats & add iter_pack
Steve Barnes
gadgetsteve at live.co.uk
Tue Jan 30 01:28:45 EST 2018
In my work I make a lot of use of struct pack & unpack but sometimes
find the fact that I either have to supply the whole format string or
add position tracking mechanisms to my code explicitly so as to use
pack_to or unpack_from if the structures that I am dealing with are not
simple arrays of a single type. In my particular use case of de/encoding
messages from a remote device that is sometimes forwarding on collected
information to & from the devices that it controls the endianness is not
always consistent between message elements in a single message.
It would be very nice if:
a) iter_unpack.next produced an iterator that optionally took an
additional parameter of a format string, (with endianness permitted), to
replace the current format string in use.
b) there was a matching iter_pack function that the next method took
either more data to pack into the buffer extending it or a new format
string, either as a named parameter or with an exposed set_fmt method on
the packer.
This would allow my specific use case and the ones where a buffer or
stream is constructed of blocks consisting of a byte or word that
specifies the data type(s) to follow (and sometimes a count) followed by
the actual data.
--
Steve (Gadget) Barnes
Any opinions in this message are my personal opinions and do not reflect
those of my employer.
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list