[Python-ideas] PEP 505: None-aware operators

[Steve Dower]

On 23Jul2018 1145, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> 
> Le 23/07/2018 à 12:38, Steve Dower a écrit :
>>
>> General comment to everyone (not just Antoine): these arguments have
>> zero value to me. Feel free to keep making them, but I am uninterested.
> 
> So you're uninterested in learning from past mistakes?
> 
> You sound like a child who thinks their demands should be satisfied
> because they are the center of the world.

Sorry if it came across like that, it wasn't the intention. A bit of 
context on why you think it's a mistake would have helped, but if it's a 
purely subjective "I don't like the look of it" (as most similar 
arguments have turned out) then it doesn't add anything to enhancing the 
PEP. As a result, I do not see any reason to engage with this class of 
argument.

I hope you'll also notice that I've been making very few demands in this 
thread, and have indicated a number of times that I'm very open to 
adjusting the proposal in the face of honest and useful feedback.

Cheers,
Steve