[Python-ideas] An alternative to PEP 572's Statement-Local Name Bindings
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Mar 3 19:38:40 EST 2018
Robert Vanden Eynde wrote:
> But I think that the implementation of print(y with y = x + 1) would
> be more close to next(y for y in [ x+1 ])
WHy on earth should it be? Expanding that gives you a generator
containing a loop that only executes once that is immediately run
to yield exactly one value. Why bother with all that overhead?
--
Greg
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list