[Python-ideas] An alternative to PEP 572's Statement-Local Name Bindings

[Robert Vanden Eynde]

> Robert Vanden Eynde wrote:
>>
>> But I think that the implementation of print(y with y = x + 1) would
>> be more close to next(y for y in [ x+1 ])
>
>
> WHy on earth should it be? Expanding that gives you a generator
> containing a loop that only executes once that is immediately run
> to yield exactly one value. Why bother with all that overhead?
>

You're probably right.